Same old same old
Given the results and performances the Tigers have pulled off this season I'd have settled for a point prior to the game. I'd have hoped for more, and knew we could beat them, but they are above us in the league for a reason. This was never going to be "an easy three points", especially with Defoe and Diarra sidelined.
It is, however, a very frustrating result. Yet again we have been unable to finish off a team and close a game out. The late Hull equaliser may well have come from a wrongly awarded corner, but lack of concentration and a special talent for squandering chances is - in the words of Sylvain Distin - "ruining our season."
I'm not sure what else I can add to the debate at this point. On the pitch the problem is so obvious, there really isn't much more discussion to be had!
I am not going to jump on the Adams substitute bashing bandwagon. People have questioned why Kanu was introduced for Utaka when we were 2-1 up, with about 15 minutes to go. I can understand the arguement that at that point in the match you could put on a more defensive player to help protect the lead. But at home, with Hull always a threat, I can also see the logic in keeping two up front and going for a third goal.
However, to condemn Adams on the basis of this one decsion - as some have - is ludicrous. In the same game don't forget, five minutes after introducing Traore and Nugent, Johnson smashed his way to the top of goal-of-the-season list. An astute move on Tony's part, then?
With the future of players, the stadium plans and ownership of the club still all in doubt I will be happy just to end this season in the Premier League! We have a fantatsic first eleven at Pompey, but we have no strength in depth. Unless we get a larger ground we will not be able to justify the salaries of additional, top drawer players. The ground really is key to the long term future of this club, and every effort must be made to keep the Horsea plan on track.